SAP, DOT, Regulation, Substance Abuse Professional Department of Transportation, DOT, Substance Abuse Professionals, SAP, Referral Service Department of Transportation, Federal Regulation 49 CFR Part 40, DOT, NON-DOT, Substance Abuse Professional Services, SAP, Referral Service, SAP network, Drug Alcohol Testing Rules, Counselors, Evaluations SAP Services Department of Transportation Regulation 49 CFR Part 40, SAP, Substance Abuse Professional, SAP Evaluation, DOT SAP Evaluation, SAP Program, Drug Alcohol Counselor, SAP Services, DOT Regulations, Substance Abuse Counselor Substance Abuse, Substance Abuse Referral Service, DOT Rules, SAP Program, Safety Sensitive Duties, DOT compliance, Chemical Dependency, Drug-free workplace, Substance Abuse Policy, SAP Referral List Home About Us Services News Resources faq Join Our Network Contact Our Network How We Work Who Are Our Clients? The SAP Process Press Releases Latest News on Regulations Proposed DOT Employer Inquiry Rule Testing Statistics Helpful Links Books Books Glossary Training and Testing Deadlines NAADAC NAADAC Upcoming Events NAADAC Professional Liability Insurance How Can I Be a SAP? How Do I Find a SAP? Why You Need SRS SAP vs EAP Questions and Answers Contact Form Join Our Mailing List Department of Transportation Regulation 49 CFR Part 40,SAP,Substance Abuse Professional,SAP Evaluation,DOT SAP Evaluation,SAP Program,Drug Alcohol Counselor,SAP Services,DOT Regulations,Substance Abuse Counselor Department of Transportation Regulation 49 CFR Part 40,SAP,Substance Abuse Professional,SAP Evaluation,DOT SAP Evaluation,SAP Program,Drug Alcohol Counselor,SAP Services,DOT Regulations,Substance Abuse Counselor Department of Transportation Regulation 49 CFR Part 40,SAP,Substance Abuse Professional,SAP Evaluation,DOT SAP Evaluation,SAP Program,Drug Alcohol Counselor,SAP Services,DOT Regulations,Substance Abuse Counselor
We provide substance abuse professional services to corporations, government agencies and individuals
We provide substance abuse professional services to corporations, government agencies and individuals
We provide substance abuse professional services to corporations, government agencies and individuals We provide substance abuse professional services to corporations, government agencies and individuals We provide substance abuse professional services to corporations, government agencies and individuals We provide substance abuse professional services to corporations, government agencies and individuals




We provide substance abuse professional services to corporations, government agencies and individuals


Join our network and become a Substance Abuse Professional

alt='We recruits qualified Substance Abuse Professionals' width='157' height='200' border='0'> alt='We recruits qualified Substance Abuse Professionals' width='157' height='44' border='0'>

Privacy Statement
Copyright
Disclaimer
SRS - Substance Abuse Professional Referral Services

SRS - Substance Abuse Professional Referral Services

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Annual Positivity Rates
(For Combined U.S. Workforce)
(More than 7.1 million tests from January to December 2003)

YEAR DRUG POSITIVITY RATE
1988 13.6%
1989 12.7%
1990 11.0%
1991 8.8%
1992 8.8%
1993 8.4%
1994 7.5%
1995 6.7%
1996 5.8%
1997 5.0%
1998 4.8%
1999 4.6%
2000 4.7%
2001 4.6%
2002 4.4%
2003 4.5%


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Positivity Rates by Testing Category


TESTING CATEGORY 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
Federally-Mandated,
Safety-Sensitive Workforce
2.5% 2.5% 2.9% 3.1% 3.2%
General U.S. Workforce 5.0% 4.8% 4.9% 4.9% 4.8%
Combined U.S. Workforce 4.5% 4.4% 4.6% 4.7% 4.6%


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Positivity Rates by Testing Reason
(For Federally-Mandated, Safety-Sensitive Workforce)
(More than 1.2 million tests from January to December 2003)

TESTING REASON 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
For Cause 13.8% 14.3% 14.4% 14.8% 14.0%
Periodic 0.75% 0.95% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1%
Post-Accident 3.1% 3.3% 3.6% 3.9% 3.7%
Pre-Employment 2.9% 2.9% 3.4% 3.6% 3.7%
Random 1.9% 1.9% 2.2% 2.4% 2.6%
Returned to Duty 2.8% 3.4% 3.5% 3.8% 4.4%


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Positivity Rates by Testing Reason
(For General U.S. Workforce)
(More than 5.9 million tests from January to December 2003)

TESTING REASON 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
For Cause 28.2% 25.9% 26.1% 25.7% 24.7%
Periodic 2.2% 2.7% 3.4% 4.4% 4.5%
Post-Accident 5.7% 5.9% 6.0% 5.9% 5.6%
Pre-Employment 4.1% 4.3% 4.4% 4.5% 4.5%
Random 6.6% 6.5% 7.0% 7.7% 6.9%
Returned to Duty 5.6% 5.6% 5.3% 5.3% 5.5%


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Positivity Rates by Drug Category
(For Federally-Mandated, Safety-Sensitive Workforce, as a Percentage of All Such Tests)
(More than 1.2 million tests from January to December 2003)

Drug Category 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
Amphetamines 0.29% 0.28% 0.29% 0.27% 0.26%
Cocaine 0.59% 0.56% 0.60% 0.64% 0.71%
Marijuana 1.34% 1.44% 1.72% 1.92% 1.86%
Opiates 0.19% 0.19% 0.26% 0.25% 0.27%
PCP 0.04% 0.04% 0.05% 0.06% 0.05%
Oxidizing Adulterants
(incl. Nitrites)
0.03% 0.05% 0.05% 0.10% 0.21%
Substitution 0.06% 0.05% 0.02% 0.03% 0.03%


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Positivity Rates by Drug Category
(For General U.S. Workforce, as a Percentage of All Such Tests)
(More than 5.9 million tests from January to December 2003)

Drug Category 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
Amphetamines 0.49% 0.34% 0.29% 0.25% 0.22%
Barbiturates 0.29% 0.30% 0.34% 0.38% 0.44%
Benzodiazepines 0.60% 0.58% 0.60% 0.55% 0.50%
Cocaine 0.74% 0.71% 0.69% 0.73% 0.80%
Marijuana 2.96% 2.98% 3.17% 3.29% 3.17%
Methadone 0.20% 0.16% 0.13% 0.13% 0.08%
Opiates 0.34% 0.27% 0.29% 0.27% 0.26%
PCP 0.03% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02%
Propoxyphene 0.67% 0.73% 0.52% 0.36% 0.33%
Oxidizing Adulterants
(incl. Nitrites)
0.02% 0.05% 0.05% 0.10% 0.23%
Substitution 0.03% 0.03% 0.03% 0.03% 0.04%


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Positivity Rates by Drug Category
(For Federally-Mandated, Safety-Sensitive Workers, as a Percentage of All Positives)
(More than 1.2 million tests from January to December 2003)

Drug Category 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
Acid/Base 0.37% 0.45% 0.32% 0.16% 0.46%
Amphetamines 11.4% 10.8% 9.6% 8.3% 7.7%
Cocaine 22.7% 21.1% 20.0% 19.6% 21.2%
Marijuana 53.6% 56.0% 58.3% 60.2% 56.9%
Opiates 7.4% 7.3% 8.5% 7.8% 8.0%
Oxidizing Adulterants
(incl. Nitrites)
0.52% 0.90% 0.82% 1.4% 3.1%
PCP 1.7% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7% 1.6%
Substituted 2.3% 1.9% 0.77% 0.77% 0.96%


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Positivity Rates by Drug Category
(For General U.S. Workforce, as a Percentage of All Positives)
(More than 5.9 million tests from January to December 2003)

Drug Category 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
Acid/Base 0.16% 0.25% 0.23% 0.07% 0.14%
Amphetamines 9.0% 6.7% 5.5% 4.8% 4.3%
Barbiturates 2.8% 2.9% 3.2% 3.5% 3.7%
Benzodiazepines 5.1% 5.0% 5.0% 4.2% 3.3%
Cocaine 13.8% 13.9% 13.2% 13.9% 15.8%
Marijuana 55.0% 57.7% 60.9% 63.0% 62.6%
Methadone 1.6% 1.2% 0.98% 0.89% 0.45%
Methaqualone 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Opiates 6.3% 5.3% 5.5% 5.2% 5.1%
Oxidizing Adulterants
(incl. Nitrites)
0.16% 0.48% 0.51% 0.88% 1.6%
PCP 0.51% 0.47% 0.46% 0.45% 0.35%
Propoxyphene 5.0% 5.6% 4.0% 2.5% 2.0%
Substituted 0.58% 0.54% 0.48% 0.56% 0.80%


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Positivity Rates by Drug Category
(For Combined U.S. Workforce, as a Percentage of All Positives)
(More than 7.1 million tests from January to December 2003

Drug Category 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
Acid/Base 0.28% 0.27% 0.24% 0.08% 0.16%
Amphetamines 9.3% 7.1% 5.9% 5.1% 4.5%
Barbiturates 2.5% 2.6% 2.9% 3.2% 3.4%
Benzodiazepines 4.7% 4.5% 4.5% 3.9% 3.1%
Cocaine 14.6% 14.6% 13.9% 14.4% 16.2%
Marijuana 54.9% 57.6% 60.6% 62.8% 62.2%
Methadone 1.4% 1.1% 0.88% 0.82% 0.42%
Methaqualone 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Opiates 6.4% 5.5% 5.8% 5.4% 5.3%
Oxidizing Adulterants
(incl. Nitrites)
0.19% 0.52% 0.54% 0.92% 1.7%
PCP 0.61% 0.58% 0.59% 0.56% 0.44%
Propoxyphene 4.5% 5.1% 3.5% 2.3% 1.8%
Substituted 0.73% 0.68% 0.51% 0.58% 0.81%
The Drug Testing Index © 2003 Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. All rights reserved.



Join our network and become a Substance Abuse Professional CLICK HERE IF YOU NEED A SAP EVALUATION

Home | About Us | Services | News | Resources | FAQ | Join Our Network | Contact Substance Abuse Professional Services Copyright
All Rights Reserved.




Email:


Web Site Designed By Etelligent Technologies






Google




SAP, DOT, Regulation, Substance Abuse Professional Department of Transportation, DOT, Substance Abuse Professionals, SAP, Referral Service Department of Transportation, Federal Regulation 49 CFR Part 40, DOT, NON-DOT, Substance Abuse Professional Services, SAP, Referral Service, SAP network, Drug Alcohol Testing Rules, Counselors, Evaluations SAP Services Department of Transportation Regulation 49 CFR Part 40, SAP, Substance Abuse Professional, SAP Evaluation, DOT SAP Evaluation, SAP Program, Drug Alcohol Counselor, SAP Services, DOT Regulations, Substance Abuse Counselor Substance Abuse, Substance Abuse Referral Service, DOT Rules, SAP Program, Safety Sensitive Duties, DOT compliance, Chemical Dependency, Drug-free workplace, Substance Abuse Policy, SAP Referral List Home About Us Services News Resources faq Join Our Network Contact Our Network How We Work Who Are Our Clients? The SAP Process Press Releases Latest News on Regulations Proposed DOT Employer Inquiry Rule Testing Statistics Helpful Links Books Books Glossary Training and Testing Deadlines NAADAC NAADAC Upcoming Events NAADAC Professional Liability Insurance How Can I Be a SAP? How Do I Find a SAP? Why You Need SRS SAP vs EAP Questions and Answers Contact Form Join Our Mailing List Department of Transportation Regulation 49 CFR Part 40,SAP,Substance Abuse Professional,SAP Evaluation,DOT SAP Evaluation,SAP Program,Drug Alcohol Counselor,SAP Services,DOT Regulations,Substance Abuse Counselor Department of Transportation Regulation 49 CFR Part 40,SAP,Substance Abuse Professional,SAP Evaluation,DOT SAP Evaluation,SAP Program,Drug Alcohol Counselor,SAP Services,DOT Regulations,Substance Abuse Counselor Department of Transportation Regulation 49 CFR Part 40,SAP,Substance Abuse Professional,SAP Evaluation,DOT SAP Evaluation,SAP Program,Drug Alcohol Counselor,SAP Services,DOT Regulations,Substance Abuse Counselor
Substance Abuse Professional Referral Service
Department of Transportation, DOT, Substance Abuse Professionals, SAP, Referral Service.
Department of Transportation, Federal Regulation 49 CFR Part 40, DOT, NON-DOT, Substance Abuse Professional Services, SAP, Referral Service, SAP network, Drug Alcohol Testing Rules, Counselors, Evaluations SAP Services.
SAP, DOT, Regulation, Substance Abuse Professional
Department of Transportation Regulation 49 CFR Part 40, SAP, Substance Abuse Professional, SAP Evaluation, DOT SAP Evaluation, SAP Program, Drug Alcohol Counselor, SAP Services, DOT Regulations, Substance Abuse Counselor.
Substance Abuse, Substance Abuse Referral Service, DOT Rules, SAP Program, Safety Sensitive Duties, DOT compliance, Chemical Dependency, Drug-free workplace, Substance Abuse Policy, SAP Referral List.
Transportation Companies, Third Party Administrators (TPA), Medical Review Officers (MRO), Labs, Safety Sensitive Employees.
Google Search Engine
Yahoo Search Engine
MSN Search Engine
Lycos Search Engine
Alta Vista Search Engine
Excite Search Engine
DogPile Search Engine
Ask Jeeves Search Engine